Courts prioritize fairness and copyright fundamental rights when respecting the autonomy of educational institutions. Over the aforesaid proposition, we have been guided because of the decision on the Supreme Court in the case of Khyber Medical University and others v. Aimal Khan and others, PLD 2022 Supreme Court 92. 9. The aforesaid exceptions are missing in the present case. In this kind of circumstances, this petition is found for being not maintainable and is also dismissed accordingly with pending application (s). Read more
The court emphasised that in cases of intentional murder, the gravity on the offense demands the most stringent punishment, considering the sanctity of human life and deterrence for opportunity offenders.
Life imprisonment is surely an alternative to your death penalty. In this kind of cases, the convicted person is sentenced to invest the remainder of their natural life powering bars.
During the dynamic realm of legal statutes, amendments Engage in a crucial role in adapting to evolving circumstances and strengthening the legal framework. One particular these notable amendment that has garnered attention is definitely the latest revision of Section 489-File with the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC).
Individual researchers working on defined research projects intended for scholarly work can use the attached form (PDF) to request PACER cost exemptions from multiple courts.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming into the main case, It is usually a well-set up proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is matter for the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.
be established without an iota of doubt in all other jurisdictions) will be inferred. This can be a horrifying reality, a very reduced threshold for an offence that carries capital punishment.
Extra username and password are needed for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details
nine. Needless to mention that any observations made in the above order are tentative in nature and shall not influence the trial Court.
This case has long been cited in several subsequent judgments, particularly in cases involving constitutional legislation, judicial independence, as well as rule of law.
Case legislation, also known as precedent, forms the foundation from the Pakistani legal system. Understanding relevant judgments and rulings is critical for interpreting statutes and predicting legal results. Free access to those resources democratizes legal knowledge, empowering citizens and advertising and marketing transparency.
, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling over the same form of case.
When the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC might dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced an opportunity to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC might allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include balance of probabilities case law the grievance notice. However, this is frequently only done When the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. Within the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence as well as petitioner company responded for the allegations as a result they were perfectly aware of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use for being looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 173 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
The residents argued that the high-voltage grid station would pose a health risk and prospective hazard to local residents. Ultimately, the court determined the scientific evidence inconclusive, though observing the general craze supports that electromagnetic fields have damaging effects on human health. The Court accepted the petitioner’s argument that it should undertake the precautionary principle established out within the 1992 Rio Declaration over the Environment and Advancement, the first international instrument that linked environment protection with human rights, whereby The shortage of full scientific certainty should not be used as being a reason to prevent environmental degradation.